Comments on: Vehicle page update #7 https://www.transportfever.com/vehicle-page-update-7/ Tue, 08 Nov 2016 19:48:25 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1 By: Talphon https://www.transportfever.com/vehicle-page-update-7/#comment-2931 Tue, 08 Nov 2016 19:48:25 +0000 http://www.transportfever.com/?p=4099#comment-2931 The 747 revolutionized both passenger and cargo transport. Thats a fact. The 707 likewise the jet that made jet commercial passenger transport viable. But they are not in the game? But the A319 and Concorde are, this is why people are upset.

]]>
By: Antonello https://www.transportfever.com/vehicle-page-update-7/#comment-1896 Fri, 07 Oct 2016 09:14:42 +0000 http://www.transportfever.com/?p=4099#comment-1896 Reading the vehicles stats, it seems that middle/late game the urban vehicles capacity is unbalanced in favour of buses.

For example, in 1950 there is the Mercedes Benz O, with a capacity of 60 passengers, then, in 1960 we have the GM Fishbowl bus, with a capacity of 55 passengers, while the latest tram available in that era is the Gothaer Type T1, that has only a capacity of 48 despite the two wagons. In 1966, with the release of the newer Be 4/6 Mirage, things get worse, because the new tram has only a capacity of 45 passengers.

This doesn’t respect reality, in real life tram capacities were near always vastely superior to bus capacities, especially when the trams had two or more elements (wagons). In real life, both the Be4/6 and the T1 + waggon had had a capacity of over 100 passengers.

I would suggest to Developers to increase the capacity of all the late game trams (or to decrease the capacity of buses), at least of a 30/40% to balance things.
It’s true that this datas should be easily moddable, but I think that it would be better to have them already balanced vanilla game.

]]>
By: Dave https://www.transportfever.com/vehicle-page-update-7/#comment-1869 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 17:33:09 +0000 http://www.transportfever.com/?p=4099#comment-1869 In reply to Dave.

Adding to my previous comment, since I couldn’t find any way to edit….

Star Citizen has been years in the making. That doesn’t mean that it’s bad, it just means that the dev found ways to improve, whether on internal or external advice from the community.

This game appears to be following a similar trend. The dev’s are considering input from all sources, else Transport Fever would not be so different from Train Fever.

I must reiterate though….. BAz,, that is the most foolish comment that I have heard in a long time.

If it were true, then all of the major films, in the last 30 years, would never have been produced… since all of them required some speculation on how well they would be received by the public. Much of that speculation involved major risk….. Star Wars took a major gamble, going against the views of a well-known film company.

Would you like to debate the results of that gamble?

Transport Fever has been well researched, and if the “we” that you posted cannot understand that, then I would suggest that you refrain from making any other comments, unless those comments involve something that is actually useful?

]]>
By: Dave https://www.transportfever.com/vehicle-page-update-7/#comment-1865 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 17:09:23 +0000 http://www.transportfever.com/?p=4099#comment-1865 In reply to BAz.

BAz…. Sorry, but you’re a fool, if you hold to that view.

I notice that you used “we” in your comment…. based on that, I have no option other to assume that you represent a company.

Regardless, I strongly suggest that you…. or those that you represent, invest no further money in ANY games. Star Citizen has been years in the making, but it is still far from being being openly released by the developer.

If you cannot make a comment that is productive and useful, for you or those that you represent, then I suggest that you make no comment at all.

]]>
By: rob https://www.transportfever.com/vehicle-page-update-7/#comment-1863 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 14:02:36 +0000 http://www.transportfever.com/?p=4099#comment-1863 In reply to SirBratpfanne.

: 5x²-(3+5)

]]>
By: me https://www.transportfever.com/vehicle-page-update-7/#comment-1857 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:36:43 +0000 http://www.transportfever.com/?p=4099#comment-1857 In reply to BAz.

WHY ARE NO SPACESHIPS IN RELEASE VERSION ? I dont want to wait for workshop spaceships… I WILL NOT BUY THIS GAME… (but I will go on set my comments here)

]]>
By: Rob https://www.transportfever.com/vehicle-page-update-7/#comment-1856 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:30:46 +0000 http://www.transportfever.com/?p=4099#comment-1856 In reply to BAz.

Maybe buy Microsoft Flight Simulator then ?

]]>
By: Rob https://www.transportfever.com/vehicle-page-update-7/#comment-1855 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:29:33 +0000 http://www.transportfever.com/?p=4099#comment-1855 In reply to BAz.

120 vehicles dude… 120… Pls stop commenting here… go outside and enjoy the weather… you seem to be very unhappy according to all those negative comments

]]>
By: Rob https://www.transportfever.com/vehicle-page-update-7/#comment-1854 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:27:16 +0000 http://www.transportfever.com/?p=4099#comment-1854 In reply to BAz.

@BAz you are spreading your negative comments all over this page.. We already know you dont like the game and you would do it so much better yourself… Maybe you should just stop set your comments and forget about this game cause it seems not to satisfy you enough.

]]>
By: Rob https://www.transportfever.com/vehicle-page-update-7/#comment-1853 Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:24:21 +0000 http://www.transportfever.com/?p=4099#comment-1853 In reply to BAz.

WTF Some people just cant get enough… Its so sad to watch such comments on such a great game… The developers spent so much time to make our wishes come true and they are working so close with community but some people still dont get enough and are complaining. Its really sad… Maybe you should learn to create your own games, then you can add as much planes as you want…

]]>